The David Lowery vs NPR Intern Debate

So… a couple of days ago, a young intern at NPR wrote a blog post about how she 'never owned any music in the first place'. And then today (or, I guess, yesterday now), David Lowery wrote a very concise, thought provoking reply (which you should read as it is one of the better pieces of writing about 'stealing' music that is out there on the internet). And then links to both posts have been floating around on the twitters and tumblrs (and I just got a Lefsetz Letter about it in the old inbox… which includes some his common bullet points of "just make good music", "Lady Gaga", and "Spotify is great and no one believes me").

For me, I think the best / most interesting point that Dave makes is the one about how all these companies (like Google, your internet provider, etc.) are getting rich off of all this so called 'free music'.

“But it’s worse than that. It turns out that Verizon, AT&T, Charter etc etc are charging a toll to get into this neighborhood to get the free stuff. Further, companies like Google are selling maps (search results) that tell you where the stuff is that you want to loot. Companies like Megavideo are charging for a high speed looting service (premium accounts for faster downloads). Google is also selling ads in this neighborhood and sharing the revenue with everyone except the people who make the stuff being looted. Further, in order to loot you need to have a $1,000 dollar laptop, a $500 dollar iPhone or $400 Samsumg tablet. It turns out the supposedly “free” stuff really isn’t free. In fact it’s an expensive way to get “free” music. Companies are actually making money from this looting activity.”

Now, yes, Emily the Intern, definitely put her foot into it (everybody is 'stealing' music… but nobody ever says that out loud). But after spending way longer than I should have spent reading some of the comments on her NPR post, I couldn't help feeling a bit sorry for her. To me, it seems like a lot of people left reading the great Dave Lowery post thinking that Emily and the millions of young people who have a similar relationship with purchasing music (or the lack thereof) as the big villains of this story. But I don't know, maybe we should point the pitchforks at the people counting all the money being made from (as David nicely put it) “charging a toll to get into this neighborhood to get the free stuff"? Yes, this whole ‘I want access to everything, all the time, for free’ attitude that the interent has produced is more than a bit troublesome for anyone making the content that everyone expects for free… but I have a feeling that the 'expect it for free' attitude is born out of the 'I'm already paying over $100 a month to have the internet on my phone and at home'. And don't get me started on how expensive it is to heat a house in England (in fact, I wrote a blog post kind of about that already)

Anyways, I mostly just wanted to pass on the link to that Dave Lowery post. It's a long, but good read. And it struck a chord with the 'record label' side of me as well as the 'music listener' side of me. Since I have those two sides, I agree with a lot of what he says and also disagree with a lot of it.

Or rather than disagree with some things, I just don't feel as passionately about shaking my fist at Emily the Intern. Especially in a room with a mirror in it. I am, afterall, loading the most recent epsidoe of Games Of Thrones and The Daily Show as I type this. You see, this 'I want it free' vs 'everybody should pay all the time' thing is a bit complicated, with a lot of moving parts.

Also, to Dave's point of “is it really that inconvenient to download a song from iTunes into your iPhone?” I would just like to add, “is it really that hard for Apple to make it possible to download music from Bandcamp while on an iPhone?”*.

*If it is now possible to download music from Bandcamp on your iPhone, I retract that statement. I just remember back when I had an iPhone, you could only seem to purchase music from iTunes. I find things like that a lot more annoying than Emily the Intern's prom date giving her 15 GB's of free music. Although, I also find giving someone 15 GB's of music annoying. Not so much for the lost artist revenue, but for the thought and time that didn't go into picking just the perfect 20 songs, putting them in the perfect order, and just giving that… and for the 100's of songs in that 15 GB's that got thrown into iTunes and were never listened to (but rather just added to the grand total of an 'I have this many songs on my computer' drop).

A Reply To A Reply To 'Dave Lowery v NPR Intern' Post

A new reason not to 'like' Facebook